What does rich learning look like? Is it math for an hour and language arts for an hour and science for an hour and “never the-thrain(?)- shall meet”?I mean, what if we want to change our world? Solve its problems? Will such classes prepare us to think all the way around the problems of our communities?
Surely not. Surely there must be a better way…one that makes sense in the real world. I mean, if we want to clean up a river, shouldn’t we know its source and destination?Understand its ecological balance?Know how many of a particular microbe per cubic milliliter to look for? Be able to track the populations and record, analyze and represent its data? Construct a compelling argument for needed interventions or a convincing report of its relative health? I scratch my head. This definitely is not an investigation for such discretely divided hours of time and content. Life happens in multitudinous arenas simultaneously.
If necessity is the mother of invention, one might also say, in corollary fashion, that purpose is the mother of inquiry. What if we give our kids purpose? Might that purpose inspire, or drive, or at least suggest, inquiry? And is that not the essential motivation of healthy human beings?
I have heard, and I would contend, that every generation needs a cause…a raison d’etre… a generational identity. Similarly, every human needs a reason to learn. Learning does not occur quite as meaningfully outside its contexts of need, or purpose. Our preeminent purpose at Da Vinci Academy, then, is to win kids over to purpose and to a life posture of inquiry, so they can find and fulfill their own purposes.
I am reminding myself of my purpose as I take a deep breath on the Friday before school begins.
Lianna Nix
Co-constructing a School as We Go
Journal Entry 2: June 25...later pondering
How about a radical notion…let’s give school a spin…let’s re-think it…orient it around its primary beneficiaries…students! Whom do students need to invest in their empowerment and equipping?Well, teachers come to mind, as usual, but teachers are only 17% of the influence on learning outcomes, if I recall my research correctly.Factors outside of school contribute fully half of influences on learning achievement. The most salient social influence on kids’ lives is, obviously, the family--especially parents. So they HAVE to be fully invested in kids’ learning if we want the kind of rich learning and teaching experiences we are talking about.
I have heard many lengthy lamentations about how difficult this is to achieve from other teachers, and we all have bemoaned the perennial problem of unsupportive parents. It seems to me, however, that we have to confront and rethink our hidden and hierarchical perceptions of us and them. We have to embrace the paradigm in my class motto: We’re all learners, and we’re all teachers. We want life to be a learning and teaching adventure for all of us…all of society, really.
Sure, we are the socially entrusted educators who have been professionally prepared in pedagogical practices (sounds pretty good, doesn’t it?).But we are NOT the most significant teachers in our students’ lives…we cannot be.We haven’t taught them the transcendent lessons of life and survival and values and norms…we enter the process long after it has begun, and must work with what has already been taught and learned, and what self-perceptions and foundational beliefs and dispositions they bring to us and to our classrooms. There does exist the possibility, however, that working alongside those self-schemas, we might engage them for moments and become the other voices in their heads, hopefully positive ones.
The point is, what if we work more organically, more authentically, with the primary voices in their heads? What will that look like? What if we open up our schools to be holistic communities where parents and family members, even certain local community servants and members, are encouraged and expected to engage at whatever level they can in parallel processes of adults facilitating identity formation and self-actualization in their children? Obviously, parents have the seminal interest in those processes. What if we re-conceptualize ourselves as educators as the ones who come alongside them to achieve our shared goals?
At DVA, we are making a valiant attempt to create such a community of learners and teachers. It is definitely messy, and sometimes difficult to negotiate the human relationships and varying levels of involvement and intensity, but I think it is going to be worth it. No, I don’t find it comfortable to be this exposed, this vulnerable to judgments and to the unresolved negativity of others (and then my own in reciprocal fashion!).And then I ask myself, what is my goal??? I want to EMPOWER and EQUIP and INSPIRE –to breathe LIFE and HOPE into middle level learners. Is that more powerfully done in synergistic collaboration with other significant adults in their lives, or working as the educational “professional” in an artificially constructed classroom that is not meaningfully contextualized in students’ lives?
I honestly don’t know what this adventure will look like. I do believe, however, that our aims are worth the efforts involved, and the discomfort and the risks of exposure. For me, it is not just a job, or a profession…it is a mission. If pioneers are willing to cut the trail, won’t it be easier for others to follow? Maybe it won’t have to be a mission for everyone. Maybe we just need to show it can be done.
Regardless of the outcome, it is worth the work and the risks to validate families, to validate the heart and effort of everyone who cares about educating our kids. It is worth saying, however we can say it, that we are ALL important in this effort, that we are ALL learners, and ALL teachers.
--Lianna Nix
Planning a Unit on the Front End
Journal Entry
Planning:June 25, 2009
So, planning today…wow! Incredible synergy—shared vision—imagination arcs and sparks everywhere…
How about this: an Atlas sculpture holding up the world made with recycled trash…what an awesome metaphor of this generation’s hope! And who is Atlas, anyway? Let’s talk about that. Why or how is that a generational, 21st century metaphor? Do we own that or not?
Design must become mathematical endeavor that addresses these questions: How tall is he? How long is his face? His neck? His torso? His legs and arms? How do we figure these things out if we want him to be larger than life? How much larger? What must we consider? And a side note…how did Leonardo answer these kinds of questions in planning his famous (albeit never completed), massive, equine statue? What evidence could we look at? How could we make use of similar techniques?
The artistic design of this sculptural metaphor….let’s make it an anchor for manyfaces…100, to be precise! How and why would that work? Is there a connection to other ideas? Could we represent this kind of idea in a circle? If we want it to represent the peoples of the earth, how many faces should each of the larger people groups have as representative? How many should be male faces? Female faces? Young? Old?
The message from our science study…sustainability and ecological responsibility. How can we represent this somehow in our metaphor? What materials can we use to send a message of redemption for this generation…reclamation…hope?
Another science connection….how can the globe Atlas holds be constructed to meaningfully model the earth as a unit of parts?
Speaking of that, what is the message of E pluribus Unum? Why is that our national motto? And what in the world does that have to do with rational numbers? Circle graphs?
Just picture it…one leaps up from her chair, another responds with eyes widened in wondrous understanding, another claps and interjects the next piece…and the vision morphs and is refined…and so on….it is magic…it is the synergy of collaborative creative sense-making.
Pause. Breathe. Think…an ambitious project to be sure…is it worth the investment on all our parts?
We think so—yes, indeed.
Now to the planning of activities that scaffold the learning necessary to create our emblematic man...